
ArmInfo. The current government in Armenia, through its actions, including against Prosperous Armenia Party (PAP) leader Gagik Tsarukyan, is seeking to demonstrate that they operate without constrains from the law, public interest, or the principles of justice, as stated by PAP representative Elinar Vardanyan to journalists on July 24 outside the Investigative Department of the State Revenue Committee of Armenia, where Tsarukyan is undergoing another interrogation.
She urged to note that the processes unfolding in Armenia have nothing to do with the rule of law. According to Vardanyan, they encounter daily violations of the Constitution, which has effectively ceased to function. In her view, the entire proceeding is an explicit act of political persecution. To support this claim, she recalled how, during the pre-election period, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signaled the need for the PAP leader's arrest. "This served as a direct instruction to law enforcement agencies to initiate a fabricated criminal case and thereby isolate Tsarukyan," Vardanyan stated.
She noted that the criminal proceedings themselves are also fraught with numerous violations of legal norms. In particular, she recalled the removal of lawyer Yerem Sargsyan from the case, as well as the situation in which he was summoned for questioning despite the guarantees provided by the Law on Advocacy and the institution of attorney-client privilege. According to Vardanyan, according to this principle, a lawyer cannot be interrogated regarding matters related to their professional activities. "However, we have witnessed this legal chaos, the purpose of which is to create the most unfavorable conditions for Tsarukyan, including within the framework of this fabricated case. In this way, the authorities are seeking to convey two key messages: that anyone who holds an opposing position may face arrest, and that the current government does whatever it wants, meaning it is not constrained by the law, the public interests, or the principles of justice," the PAP representative clarified.
Vardanyan noted that, under these circumstances, she has no expectations from the State Revenue Committee's Investigative Department, where the interrogation is taking place, nor from the judicial system as a whole. According to her, experience shows that in rare cases, judges have made decisions that comply with the law and the rule of law. She added that, in the current reality, one can only hope that the case will be referred to a judge who will be guided exclusively by the law and legal principles. "We don't expect anything from state agencies, since they act in the interests of one person and will ultimately make a decision dictated from above," the PPA representative concluded.