Vladimir Kazimirov: The tale on "1994-95 Agreements" was generated by  Baku avoidance to fulfill its libalilities in a normal manner. 

ArmInfo. "The public discussions in respect to international conflicts might be useful, but could be also useless, and even harmful, if false statements are  not responded promptly. Many  things depend here of the facts being  correct and arguments being strong, anmd those should be not dressed  up with emotions and personal escapades," Vladimir Kazimirov, the  Spercial Representative of The Russian President on Karabakh and  the    1992-1996 OSCE  Minsk Group Russian team leader  states. 

 "For instance, in response to my critics of regular threats  of  Azerbaijani President to solve the Karabakh conflict using military  power and tales of Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry Press Secretary  Hickmet Gadjiev, the same Gadjiev had published   on February 6 a  huge material. My critics was preconditioned by obvious distortions  of initial documents on cease fire in Karabakh. There were two  agreements in real: first one - on cease fire of February 4, 1995,  and the second was signed on February 4, 1995 in respect to the cease  fire status improvement. Both documents are signed by three parties   of the Conflict (Azerbaijan, Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh), and both  Agreements are term less by defaults. 

According to Kazimirov, Baku undertook a number of liabilities in  respect to those Agreements, but  does not fully observe the first  one, and totally ignores the second. Azerbaijan  argues the term less  nature of the 1994 Agreements and intends to shift it with verbal one  reached in Moscow after April 2016 crisis. Baku behaves like 1994  Agreement does not exist at all, and many times failed to observe it.  Exactly that failing to observe own liabilities undertaken generated  the tale about "1994-1995 Agreements." Russian diplomat states also  that  Gadjiev   modified some false attachment   to the Agreements  which claims the withdrawal of Armenian army from the territories  conquered during the war. Meanwihile, no such attachment exists in  the world. Kazimirov  thinks that this tale is needed in Baku to  intensify their demands  for Armenian army to abandon the  territories.  

Keeping silent about his fakes, the author  gives many other "pearls"  in his article. Accusing  the mediators and Minsk co-chairs became a  bad habit of official Baku. But everybody  knows that the solution  depends on flexibility and ability to search for compromises and find  those.